M00N Report vs qTest: MCP server, live results and public pricing

qTest is Tricentis' unified test management platform for large QA organizations: requirements traceability, an event-driven Jira integration, compliance workflows and, since 2024, the qTest Copilot AI assistant. It is a serious enterprise product with enterprise sales to match - there is no public price list.

M00N Report covers the same core jobs - test case management, automated result tracking, analytics and AI tooling - with transparent per-user pricing, a free tier, and results that stream in live over WebSockets during the run.

At a Glance

qTest

qTest is a mature enterprise test management platform inside the wider Tricentis suite (Tosca, Vera, NeoLoad). It does real things M00N Report does not: a native requirements entity with a genuine traceability matrix, session-based exploratory testing through qTest Explorer, Vera e-signature workflows for Computer Systems Validation in regulated industries, and genuinely LLM-based test authoring via qTest Copilot and its 2026 Agentic Test Creation. Its event-driven Jira integration plus Azure Boards and Rally support are built for large, multi-team QA organizations.

M00N Report

M00N Report streams results live over WebSockets while a run is still executing, where qTest submits automated results in batch after the run and refreshes Insights dashboards on a timed cycle (the Rapid Dashboard hourly, and its own docs say it is not real-time). Pricing is public - a free tier, then $25 per user/month - and the MCP server plus full analytics ships on every plan including self-hosted, whereas qTest gates its MCP server and Data Export API to SaaS. It is a lighter, transparent alternative a lean team can start using the same day.

Pick qTest if you are a large or regulated enterprise that needs requirements traceability, compliance sign-off and the Tricentis platform; pick M00N Report if you want live reporting, published pricing and MCP tooling on every plan without an enterprise sales cycle.

Real-Time Reporting

FeatureqTestM00N Report
Live result streaming during the runNoBatch REST submission after execution; the automation host polls, runs, then pushes logsYesWebSocket updates while the run executes
Dashboards update without manual refreshPartialInsights auto-refresh at 1 to 20 minute intervals; Rapid Dashboard refreshes hourlyYesPush updates, no refresh cycle
Step-by-step live updatesNoYesSteps, retries, screenshots and videos as they happen

AI and MCP

FeatureqTestM00N Report
AI agent runs a manual test executionPartialOfficial MCP, SaaS-only; per-step manual result writing is not documentedYesThe run_manual_execution prompt walks the agent through it: read each case step, exercise it against the app, write pass/fail back per step with an issue note. Case and group statuses derive themselves. Included on every plan, cloud and self-hosted.
AI test case generationYesqTest Copilot (GA since 2024) plus agentic test creation; existing customers need the Enterprise AI upgradePartialBy design, no native LLM and no Enterprise AI upgrade to buy. Your own AI model fills in project-aware scaffolding via MCP with the access it already has, then create_test_case persists it (Markdown supported).
Official MCP server for AI agentsYesRemote MCP server, SaaS-only, officially tested with CursorYesFull read and write access; Claude clients via the remote OAuth connector, Cursor and other MCP clients via the published npm package with an MCP key; cloud and self-hosted
AI failure analysis and flaky detectionNoDocumented AI functions are chat, case generation and MCPYesStatistical flaky detection built in (retry-based and cross-run); failure triage performed by your own AI model via MCP, not a built-in AI feature

Test Case Management

FeatureqTestM00N Report
Manual cases, folders, custom fieldsYesMature enterprise TCMYes
Compliance workflowsYesVera integration for Computer Systems Validation (Vera is a separately licensed Tricentis product)NoNot aimed at CSV-regulated processes
Automated result linked to its manual caseYesYesNative linking in one data model

Deployment and Pricing

FeatureqTestM00N Report
Public transparent pricingNoQuote-only; third parties estimate roughly $82 per user/monthYes$25 per user/month, published
Free tierNoNo free tier; self-service 14-day trial of all modules via the Tricentis Trials siteYes3 members, 1 project, no credit card
Self-hosted optionPartialqTest On-Premises exists, but MCP and the Data Export API are SaaS-onlyYesFull feature parity at the same per-user price

Pricing

qTest

Quote-only: Tricentis publishes no prices for qTest. Third-party estimates put it around $82 per user/month (regional Tricentis site figure) with premium modules quoted separately - treat any number as an estimate until sales gives you one.

Source: official pricing page (as of 2026-07-19)

M00N Report

Free tier for small teams (no credit card); Team at $25 per user/month or $250 per user/year. Self-hosted is a plan at the same per-user price, not an enterprise upcharge.

See full pricing

When qTest is the better fit

  • You are a large enterprise standardizing on the wider Tricentis platform (Tosca, Vera) with budget for quote-based licensing.
  • You need compliance-grade workflows such as Computer Systems Validation approval chains for regulated industries.
  • You want an event-driven Jira integration plus Azure Boards and Rally support at enterprise scale.

When M00N Report is the better fit

  • Your regression pass is manual and repetitive: an AI agent can run the execution case by case, writing pass/fail back per step with an issue note, and leave the same evidence a human tester would.
  • You want to know the price before talking to sales: $25 per user/month, free tier included.
  • You want results streaming live during the run, not batch logs after execution with dashboards on refresh cycles.
  • You want MCP and full analytics on self-hosted too, not just on SaaS.
  • You are a lean team that does not need an enterprise sales cycle to start reporting tests today.

Switching from qTest

Export test cases from qTest to Excel via the Test Case Detail report, convert to CSV, and import them into M00N Report with the field-mapping wizard - or let an AI assistant recreate them through the MCP server from Markdown. The qTest REST API can extract runs, defects and requirements if you need deeper history. Automated results start streaming as soon as you add a published reporter to your suite.

Bottom Line

qTest is the stronger choice when your needs are enterprise and regulated. A native requirements-to-test traceability matrix, Vera e-signature approval chains for Computer Systems Validation, exploratory testing sessions, and deep ties to Tosca, Azure Boards and Rally are all things M00N Report does not try to match, and qTest Copilot is genuinely LLM-based test authoring rather than scaffolding. If you are standardizing a large QA organization on the Tricentis platform and can work with quote-based licensing, qTest is built for you. M00N Report is aimed at a different team: one that wants to watch results stream in live during the run, know the price before talking to sales, and get the same MCP server and analytics on self-hosted as on cloud. If that is you, M00N Report starts today on a free tier. If you need compliance-grade validation and full requirements traceability, qTest remains the better fit.

Frequently asked questions

Can an AI agent actually run my manual test cases?

In M00N Report, yes. The manual run itself is exposed over MCP: the agent reads each case step as data, exercises it against your app with its own tooling such as a browser MCP, and writes pass or fail back per step, with case, group and execution statuses deriving themselves. It fits regression passes and exploratory sessions, and a human can take over the same run mid-way. qTest has an official MCP, SaaS-only, but per-step manual result writing is not documented; Copilot generates cases for a human to run.

Is M00N Report a qTest alternative?

Yes, for teams that want modern test reporting and case management without an enterprise sales cycle. qTest remains a fit for large regulated enterprises invested in the Tricentis platform.

How much does qTest cost?

Tricentis does not publish qTest pricing - it is quote-only. Third-party estimates hover around $82 per user/month. M00N Report publishes its pricing: free tier, then $25 per user/month or $250 per user/year.

Does qTest have AI and MCP?

Yes - qTest Copilot generates test cases and Tricentis ships an official remote MCP server, though the MCP is SaaS-only and existing customers need an Enterprise AI upgrade for Copilot. M00N Report includes its MCP server on every plan, cloud and self-hosted.

Can I self-host qTest?

qTest On-Premises exists and is maintained, but Tricentis gates the MCP server and Data Export API to SaaS. M00N Report self-hosted has full feature parity with cloud at the same per-user price.

Facts verified on 2026-07-21. Spotted something outdated? Tell us on Discord.

See your tests land in real time

View pricing